Revista de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía de Obesidad y Metabólica y de la Sociedad Española para el Estudio de la Obesidad
"Bariátrica & Metabólica Ibero-Americana"
Español Inglés

SADI-S vs OAGB como cirugía revisional después de gastrectomía vertical. Revisión sistemática

Artículos de Revisión

Hernan Sorto, Ramon Vilallonga

DOI: 10.53435/funj.00890

Vol. 13, Núm. 1 (2023): Mayo 2023

Resumen:
Antecedentes. Debido a la posibilidad del fallo de la manga gástrica, y del aumento de la necesidad de un procedimiento revisional efectivo, se analiza el SADI-S y OAGB como opciones efectivas y morbilidad baja. Objetivo. El propósito de la revisión es analizar la literatura disponible sobre SADI-S y OAGB como procedimientos revisionales en el fallo de la manga gástrica Método. Revisión exhaustiva de literatura realizada hasta mayo del 2022 en relación a estudios en inglés y español sobre SADI-S y OAGB , con los objetivos de evaluar la eficacia como procedimientos revisionales, morbilidad, resolución de comorbilidades y mortalidad. Resultado. Se analizaron 18 estudios incluyendo 1120 pacientes en los cuales el procedimiento primario fue la LSG, en 751 pacientes se realizó OAGB y 369 se realizó SADI-S como procedimiento revisional. El TWL% fue de 28.1% y 29.3% y EWL% de 60.9% y 69.7% para OAGB y SADI-S respectivamente. El índice de morbilidad fue de 11.6% para OAGB y de 16.9% para SADI-S con una mortalidad del 0% y 0.67% respectivamente.

Palabras Clave:
OAGB, SADI-S, cirugía revisional, fallo de manga gástrica

Bibliografía:
  1. Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R. et al. Laparoscopic Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss Failure: Mid-Term Results. OBES SURG 30, 2259–2265 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04461-z
  2. Mahdy T, Gado W, Alwahidi A. et al. Sleeve Gastrectomy, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass in Treatment of Morbid Obesity: a Retrospective Cohort Study. OBES SURG 31, 1579–1589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05159-y
  3. Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R, et al. Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Nov;12(9):1655-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Feb 26. PMID: 27317599.
  4. Kraljević M, Cordasco V, Schneider R. et al. Long-term Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: What Are the Results Beyond 10 Years?. OBES SURG 31, 3427–3433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05437-3
  5. de la Cruz M, Büsing M, Dukovska R, Torres AJ, Reiser M. Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Aug;16(8):1060-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.014 Epub 2020 Apr 21. PMID: 32473786.
  6. Moszkowicz D, Rau C, Guenzi M, Zinzindohoué F, Berger A, Chevallier JM. Laparoscopic omega-loop gastric bypass for the conversion of failed sleeve gastrectomy: Early experience. Journal of Visceral Surgery, Volume 150, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 373-378, ISSN 1878-7886, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.08.010.
  7. Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O, et al. Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Second Step Procedure After Sleeve Gastrectomy—a Retrospective Cohort Study. OBES SURG 29, 819–827 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03629-y
  8. Spinos D, Skarentzos K, Esagian SM, et al. The Effectiveness of Single-Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS): an Updated Systematic Review. OBES SURG 31, 1790–1800 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05188-7
  9. Poghosyan T, Alameh A, Bruzzi M, et al. Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss Failure. OBES SURG 29, 2436–2441 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03864-x
  10. Guan B, Chong TH, Peng J, et al. Mid-long-term Revisional Surgery After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. OBES SURG 29, 1965–1975 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03842-3
  11. Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Carbonell JA, et al. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass after Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure: Does a Single Procedure Fit for all?. OBES SURG 31, 1722–1732 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05191-y
  12. Jamal MH, Elabd R, AlMutairi R, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a Revision for Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 30, 2280–2284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04484-6
  13. Mann JP, Jakes AD, Hayden JD, et al. Systematic Review of Definitions of Failure in Revisional Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 25, 571–574 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1541-2
  14. Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, Berger A, Douard R, Chevallier J. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Volume 12, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 240-245, ISSN 1550-7289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.08.521
  15. AlSabah S, Al Haddad E, Al-Subaie S, et al. Short-Term Results of Revisional Single-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Regain. OBES SURG 28, 2197–2202 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3158-3
  16. Noun R, Slim R, Chakhtoura G, Gharios J, Chouillard E, Tohmé-Noun C. "Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results", Journal of Obesity, vol. 2018, Article ID 4049136, 6 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4049136
  17. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio M, Pérez N, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a revisional or second-step operation after sleeve gastrectomy. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Volume 16, Issue 10, 1491 - 1496 ISSN: 15507289 DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.022
  18. Vanetta C, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, et al. Current Status of Robot-Assisted Revisional Bariatric Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1820.https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071820
  19. Noel P, Nedelcu A, Eddbali I, Gagner M, Danan M, Nedelcu M. Five-year results after resleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Sep;16(9):1186-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 24. PMID: 32580923.
  20. Howell RS, Liu HH, Boinpally H, et al. Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: Patients with Body Mass Index 60 or Greater. JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2):e2020.00089. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00089. PMID: 34248332; PMCID: PMC8241285.
  21. Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, Karmali S, de Gara C. “A Comparison of Revisional and Primary Bariatric Surgery.” Canadian Journal of Surgery 60, no. 3 (June 1, 2017): 205. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.006116.
  22. Brown WA, Ooi G, Higa K, et al. Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement. OBES SURG 28, 1207–1216 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3201-4
  23. Mahawar KK, Himpens JM, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach. Surg Endosc 34, 1648–1657 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06937-1
  24. Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Conde M, Arrue E, Perez-Aguirre E, Torres A. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy (2015) Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases,11(2), pp. 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.06.016
  25. Bashah M, Aleter A, Baazaoui J, et al. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as Revisional Procedures for Patients with Weight Recidivism After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes. OBES SURG 30, 4715–4723 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04933-2
  26. Dijkhorst, Phillip J, Boerboom AB, et al. Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass or Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass? A Multicenter Cohort Study. Obesity Surgery 28, no. 12 (December 1, 2018): 3834–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3429-z.
  27. Admella V, Osorio J, Sorribas M, et al. Direct and Two-Step Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S): Unicentric Comparative Analysis of 232 Cases. Cirugía Española (English Edition) 99, no. 7 (August 1, 2021): 514–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.017.
  28. Rayman S, Assaf D, Azran C. et al. Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure—Revision to Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Roux-n-Y Gastric Bypass: a Multicenter Study. OBES SURG 31, 2927–2934 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05334-9
  29. Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-Term Results and Responsiveness Predictors After Two-Step Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1302-1308. doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2471-y. PMID: 27914029.
  30. Robert M, Poghosyan T, Delaunay D, et al. Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):e037576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037576. PMID: 32873678; PMCID: PMC7467507.
  31. Yeo C, Ho G, Syn N, et al. Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Restrictive Index Surgery—a Metaanalysis and Comparison with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obesity Surgery. 2020 doi:10.1007/s11695-020-05094-y
  32. Jia D, Tan H, Faramand A, Fang F. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. 2019 Obesity Surgery. doi:10.1007/s11695-019-04288-3
  33. Musella M, Bruni V, Greco F, et al. Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (2019) 15(8) 1332-1339 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026
  34. Ferrer JV, Acosta A, García-Alementa M, et al. High rate of de novo esophagitis 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective multicenter study in Spain. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Volume 18, Issue 4, 2022, Pages 546-554. ISSN 1550-7289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2021.11.011
  35. Vilallonga R, Sanchez-Cordero S, Umpiérrez Mayor N, et al. GERD after Bariatric Surgery. Can We Expect Endoscopic Findings?. Medicina 2021 (Kaunas, Lithuania), 57(5), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050506
  36. Curell A, Beisani M, García Ruiz de Gordejuela A, et al. Outcomes of Conversion from Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Due to GERD-a Retrospective Analysis of 35 Patients. 2021 Obesity surgery, 31(9), 4100–4106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05541-4
  37. Kermansaravi M, Shahmiri SS, DavarpanahJazi AH, et al. One Anastomosis/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) as Revisional Surgery Following Primary Restrictive Bariatric Procedures: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. OBES SURG 31, 370–383 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05079-x
  38. Zhu J, Du L, Lu L, et al. Laparoscopic Re-sleeve Gastrectomy with Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Switch (RS-SADIS) for Weight Regain or Unsatisfied Weight Loss After Initial Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 31, 4647–4648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05517-4
  39. Ceha CM, van Wezenbeek MR, Versteegden DP, et al. Matched Short-Term Results of SADI Versus GBP After Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 28, 3809–3814 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3415-5
  40. Liagre A, Martini F, Anduze Y, et al. Efficacy and Drawbacks of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Center. OBES SURG 31, 2691–2700 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05323-y
  41. Bhandari M, Humes T, Kosta S, et al. Revision operation to one-anastomosis gastric bypass for failed sleeve gastrectomy. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases.Volume 15, Issue 12, 2019, Pages 2033-2037. ISSN 1550-7289
  42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.064
  43. Sabench Pereferrer F, Domínguez-Adame Lanuza E, Ibarzabal A, et al. “Criterios de Calidad En Cirugía Bariátrica: Revisión de Conjunto y Recomendaciones de La Asociación Española de Cirujanos y de La Sociedad Española de Cirugía de La Obesidad.” Cirugía Española 95, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.09.007.
  44. Mahawar KK, Graham Y, Carr WR, et al. (2015). Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes with Respective Primary Procedures. Obesity Surgery, 25(7), 1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1670-2
  45. Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S, et al. (2016). Revision of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Weight Regain: a Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes. Obesity surgery, 26(7), 1627–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2201-5

Texto Completo:
PDF

ISSN

2250-737X

Estamos indexados y adscritos a

Directory Open Journal Acces, Journaltocs.ac.uk, Latindex, Dulcinea, ISSN.org, LIS Cuba.

Artículos más leídos
Licencia creative commons
Licencia creative commons

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es

BMI Journal
SECO - SEEDO

Una cookie o galleta informática es un pequeño archivo de información que se guarda en su navegador cada vez que visita nuestra página web. La utilidad de las cookies es guardar el historial de su actividad en nuestra página web, de manera que, cuando la visite nuevamente, ésta pueda identificarle y configurar el contenido de la misma en base a sus hábitos de navegación, identidad y preferencias. Las cookies pueden ser aceptadas, rechazadas, bloqueadas y borradas, según desee. Ello podrá hacerlo mediante las opciones disponibles en la presente ventana o a través de la configuración de su navegador, según el caso. En caso de que rechace las cookies no podremos asegurarle el correcto funcionamiento de las distintas funcionalidades de nuestra página web. Más información en el apartado “POLÍTICA DE COOKIES” de nuestra página web.

Aceptar Rechazar